Tuesday, August 31, 2010

What is Antinomianism? A question asked by a friend of mine when we were talking about the teachings of Joseph Prince. While it is known to many that Mr. J. Prince teachings stemmed from his association with the "word of faith" movement (the "name it-claim it" teachings), many followers of this man are not aware that deep in his teachings is the heresy of "antinomianism." My friend contested "but he is a great preacher of grace, isn't he?" My reply was, "some of his teachings may sound good, but is that what the bible really teaches us?"

In this blog, I will let RC Sproul enlighten us on this heresy. I will share with everyone RC's teachings based on his book - Essential Truths of the Christian Faith. (p. 253)

Antinomianism literally means "anti-lawism." It denies or downplays the significance of God's law in the life of the believer. It is the opposite of its twin heresy, legalism.

Antinomianism acquire their distaste for the law in a number of ways. Some believe they no longer are obligated to keep the moral law of God because Jesus has freed them from it. They insist that grace not only frees us from the curse of God's law but delivers us from any obligation to obey God's law. Grace then becomes a license for disobedience.

The astounding thing is that people hold this view despite Paul's vigorous teaching against it. Paul, more than any other New Testament writer, emphasized the differences between law and grace. He gloried in the New Covenant. Nevertheless, he was most explicit in his condemnation of antinomianism. In Romans 3:31 he writes, "Do we then make void the law through faith? Certainly not! On the contrary, we establish the law."

Martin Luther, in expressing the doctrine of justification by faith alone, was charged with antinomianism. Yet he affirmed with James that "faith without works is dead." Luther contested with his student Johann Agricola on this issue. Agricola denied that the law has any purpose in the life of the believer. He even denied that the law served to prepare the sinner for grace. Luther responded to Agricola with his work Against the Antinomians 1539. Agricola later recanted his antinomian teachings, but the issue remained.

Subsequent Lutheran theologians affirmed Luther's view of the law. In the Formula of Concord (1577), the last of the classical Lutheran statements of faith, they outlines three uses of the law: (1) to reveal sin; (2) to establish general decency in the society at large; and (3) to provide a rule of life for those regenerated through faith in Christ.

Antinomianism's primary error is confusing justification with sanctification. We are justified by faith alone, apart from works. However, all believers grow in faith by keeping God's holy commands - not to gain God's favor, but out of loving gratitude for the grace already bestowed on them through the work of Christ.

It is a serious "error" to assume that the Old Testament was a covenant of law and the New Testament, a covenant of grace. The Old Testament is a monumental testimony to God's amazing grace toward His people. Likewise, the Testament literally filled with commandments. We are not saved by the law, but we demonstrate our love for Christ by obeying His commandments. "If you love Me," Jesus said, "keep My commandments" (John 14:15).

We frequently hear the statement, "Christianity isn't a lot of do's and don'ts; it is not a list of rules." There is some truth in this deduction, inasmuch as Christianity is far more than a mere list of rules. It is, at its center, a personal relationship with Christ Himself. Yet Christianity is also not less than rules. The New Testament clearly includes some do's and don'ts. Christianity is not a religion that sanctions the idea that everyone has the right to do what is right in his own eyes. On the contrary, Christianity never gives anyone the "right" to do what is wrong.

Summary

1. Antinomianism is the heresy that says Christians have no obligation to obey the laws of God.
2. The law reveal sin, is a foundation for decency in society, and is a guide for the Christian life.
3. Antinomianism confuses justification and sanctification.
4. Law and grace fill both the Old and New Testaments.
5. Though obeying God's law is not the meritorious cause of our justification, a justified person is expected to strive ardently to obey the commandments of God.

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Month of July Reading - RC Sproul Books


Gearing up for another great month of reading for July. I picked this man of God - RC Sproul to be my teacher by reading his work. I definitely would love to discover some intellectual nuggets from his Godly wisdom through his writings. Great stuff!

Book 4 To Read for the Month of July 2010


Another work by RC Sproul - "Essential Truths of the Christian Faith."

Book 3 To Read for the Month of July 2010


RC Sproul on "The Holiness of God."

Book 2 To Read for the Month of July 2010


Picking the brain of one of our generation's man of God. RC Sproul - "What is  Reformed Theology?"

Book 1 To Read for the Month of July 2010

Starting the month of July with a book from J. Macarthur. "The Book on Leadership."

Sunday, June 6, 2010

News Feed, Friend Requests and Hours Spent on Facebook


News Feed, Friend Requests and Hours Spent on Facebook

Since Facebook open it gates to everyone ages 13 and older with a valid email address in October 2008, there has been millions who are currently using the services of this social networking site. Many users have integrated this site into their daily practices and for some, their day is not complete without taking a peek on their account’s main page or clicking on “most recent” to post their “likes” or comments.

Wikipedia (online free encyclopedia) defines social networking sites as a service that focuses on building and reflecting on social networks or social relations among people who shares the same interests and/or activities. This allows the user to share ideas, activities, events, and interests within their individual networks. It is also a way to communicate with friends and relatives through messages and real time chats. There is no doubt in my mind that Facebook caters to a diverse group of users all over the world and in different languages that connects people together. While I do not question the benefits of using this site, I just wonder if one user should use discipline and discretion on the amount of time he or she will spend navigating through this site.

In January 2009, Compete.com, an online site that analyzes online company’s data and use them to help their clients in their marketing strategies, ranked Facebook as the most used social network by worldwide monthly active users. With its easy to use features and real time updates on user’s news feed page, no wonder it is the mostly used and most popular social networking site for this generation. There is no question that people continue to gravitate towards this site. In August 2009, Nielsen Online, an online research company that provides measurement and analysis of online audiences as one of their main services, reported that users spent 5 hours and 46 minutes on an average every time they sit in front of the computer and open their Facebook account. I can equate this amount of time to 2 trips to the grocery store, a complete cleaning of a 2 storey house, a complete round of golf, one-way trip to California, several chapters of reading on my favorite book, watching 2 movies on DVD back to back, and more.

There is no doubt in my mind that millions of users are benefitting from using Facebook to connect with their friends and families every day. It is also a great means to get updated on what your in-network friends are up to now a day including reading about their inner thoughts sometimes, but let us not forget of some of the issues that plague large online networking services such as; too much personal information can pave the way to the threat of sexual predators, data theft, and computer viruses. Also, one of the common misuses of social networking site is that it is sometimes used to emotionally abuse individuals. This is called trolling, where confrontation in real world are translated online. Since there is not many limitations what an individual can post when online, whether offensive words or pictures, these can cause a great deal of emotional pain for another individual.

In conclusion, as far as individual users limiting their use of Facebook, it is really up to their discretion. Facebook is supposed to bring people together by being a tool to communicate with friends and love ones, but when a user cannot balance the use of Facebook and family life, ministry, and school, one need to re-evaluate his or her priorities - my humble opinion.